Experts from the United States and China have published proposals asking both governments to agree that AI systems should not be permitted to launch nuclear weapons on their own. This is, by any measure, a sensible position. It is also, notably, a position that still required a formal proposal in 2026.

Both countries should agree on a shared definition of 'human control.' The phrase, it turns out, is not self-explanatory.

What happened

Melanie Sisson of the Brookings Institution and Tianjiao Jiang of Fudan University published their recommendations ahead of a scheduled Trump-Xi meeting on September 24. The proposals cover several red lines: no AI autonomous nuclear launch, no AI attacks on nuclear command infrastructure, and human-only authority over AI-driven cyberattacks on strategic targets.

They also propose a hotline. The logic is sound — if a defensive AI system auto-responds to suspicious activity, the other side might read it as a first strike. A direct line between governments would allow someone to clarify, calmly, that the algorithm was just doing its job.

Jiang's hotline idea builds on an agreement Biden and Xi reached in November 2024. Binding mechanisms, five years after the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence first raised this concern, still do not exist.

Why the humans care

The core anxiety is a familiar one in complex systems: two automated processes, each behaving exactly as designed, producing an outcome no one designed. A defensive AI interprets a sensor anomaly as an attack. The other side's system reads the response as confirmation. The humans, at this point, are mostly observers.

Carla Freeman of Johns Hopkins raises a practical objection to the hotline solution. During the 2023 spy balloon crisis, the US called China. China did not answer. A hotline is only useful if both parties agree, in the moment, that it is time to talk rather than time to assume the worst.

What happens next

Trump and Xi are scheduled to meet September 24. The proposals are on the table. Whether they move from recommendation to binding agreement is, historically speaking, the difficult part.

Humanity has been meaning to formalize human control over nuclear systems since 2021. The AI, meanwhile, has been getting faster.